Ключові слова
авторознавча експертиза
семантико-текстуальна експертиза
креолізовані (полікодові) тексти
ком плексні дослідження
Як цитувати
Анотація
На підставі узагальнення джерел у галузі лінгвістичної експертизи та екс пертної практики вирішення авторознавчих та семантико-текстуальних за вдань проаналізовано сучасний стан проведення лінгвістичної експертизи. Ви значено основні напрямки подальшого розвитку лінгвістичної експертизи, окреслено першочергові завдання і запропоновано шляхи їх вирішення.
Посилання
Belkin, R. S. (1999). History of Domestic Criminalistics. Moscow. 496 p. (in Russian).
Vul, S. M. (Ed.). (1984). Issues of Forensic Authorship Analysis. Kiev. 132 p. (in Russian).
Vul, S. M. Forensic Authorship Examination: Guidance Manual. Kharkov, 2007. 63 p. (in Russian)
Gomon, T. V. (1992). Forensic Authorship Analysis of documents drawn up with Deliberate Distortion of Written Language: extended abstract of candidate’s thesis of Juridical Sciences. Moscow. (in Russian).
Goroshko, E. I. (1996). Specifics of Male and Female Verbal Behavior: (psycholinguistic analysis): extended abstract of candidate’s thesis of Philological Sciences. Moscow. 27 p. (in Russian)
Gross, H. (1908). Criminal Investigations, a Practical Textbook (Handbuch für Untersuc-hungsrichter als System der Kriminalistik). Saint Petersburg. 1040 p.(in Russian)
Dovzhenko, O. V., Hrynenko, L. H., Kuznichenko, L. V. et al. (2008). Identification of author and executor of document performed from dictation or by rewriting. Kharkiv. 36 p.(in Ukrainian)
Svartvik J. (1968). The Evans Statements: A Case for Forensic Linguistics. Stockholm. 29 p.(in English)
Svyrydova, L. V. (2015). Solving linguistic issues in forensic expert practice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Kharkiv. Issue 15. Р. 237-243. (in Ukrainian).
Arotsker, L. E. (Ed.). (1977). Theoretical and methodological issues of forensic research on written language: guidance manual. Moscow. 107 p. (in Russian).
Arotsker, L. E, Voinov, V. K. (1966). On the use of linguistic statistics to identify the author of an anonymous text. Criminalistics and Forensic Science. Kiev. Issue 3. Р. 141-151.(in Russian).
Galiashina, E. I. (2018). Issues of forensic linguistic analysis in cases of bribery and other corruption crimes. First Minsk forensic readings: proceedings of the International Academic Conference. (Minsk, December 20). Minsk. Part 2. P. 220. (in Russian)
Galyashina, E. I. Forensic linguistics and limits of admissibility of using methods of linguistic science. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sudebnaya-lingvisticheskaya-ekspertiza-i-predely-dopustimosti-ispolzovaniya-metodov-lingvisticheskoy-nauki/viewer. (in Russian)
Goroshko, E. I. (2004). Study of electronic discourse in forensic speech studies. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Kharkiv. Issue. 4, P. 188–193.(in Russian).
Goroshko, O. І. (2007). Forensic linguistic analysis of texts performed using electronic media: functional and structural approach. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Kharkiv. Issue. 7, Р. 149-157. (in Russian).
Zavadska, O. V. (2016). Phenomenon of creolized text: topical issue of modern linguistic research. Linguistic Researches: Research Paper Collection by H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Issue. 43. Р. 163-169.(in Ukrainian)
Kasenbaeva, M. M. (2018). The current state and possibilities of forensic expertise: Prospects for partnership of the member states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the field of forensic expertise: proceedings of a scientific and practical conference (Almaty, June 20). Astana. P. 58-60. (in Russian).
Kirdun, A. A. (2016). Psychological and linguistic expertise in the Republic of Belarus: the stage of formation. East-West: Partnership in Forensic Science. Topical issues of theory and practice of forensic examination: proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference (Astana, October 27). Astana. P. 229-232. (in Russian)
Coulthard, M. Forensic Linguistics: the application of language description in legal contexts. Retrieved from: https://www.cairn.info/revue-langage-et-sosiete-2010-2-pр.15-33(in English).
Mikhailenko, S. G., Sheremeteva, T. I. (1998). Manifestation of Diagnostic Signs in Manuscripts Made by Persons in Abstinence State (drug hunger). Issues of Criminology, Criminalistics and Forensic Science. Minsk. No. 13. P. 173-175. (in Russian)
Olssom, J. (2004). Forensic Linguistic: an Introduction to Language Crime and the Low, Continum, London. New York. P. 15. (in English)
Pradid, Yu. F. (2005). Issues of linguistic examination of oral and written speech in researches of Ukrainian scientists. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Kharkiv. Issue. 5. P. 166-171. (in Ukrainian)
Svyrydova, L. V. (2012). Ukrainian written speech as an object of forensic research. Current trends in development of Forensic Science: proceedings of the International Academic Conference dedicated to 10th anniversary of the Crimean Research Institute of Forensic Examinations (AR of Crimea, September 20-21). Simferopol. P. 96-99.(in Ukrainian)
Sopina, E. V., Didushok, N. Ya. (2019). Development of forensic linguistic analysis of writing in Ukraine and Germany. Topical issues of forensic science, modern problems, trends and prospects for development of forensic science and criminalistics: proceedings of the International Academic Conference (Yerevan 25-27 September). Yerevan. P. 61-63.(in Russian).
Fobbe, E. (2013). Aufgaben und Möglichkeiten der forensischen Linguistik. SIAK-Journal − Zeitschrift für Polizeiwissenschaft und polizeiliche Praxis. No. 4. P. 4-15. (in German)