Анотація
В статті розглядається проблематика порядку залучення слідчим особи до конфіденційного співробітництва та проведення негласних слідчих (роз шукових) дій під час досудового розслідування корупційних кримінальних про ваджень та його вплив на допустимість доказів. На основі вивчення судової практики Вищого антикорупційного суду зроблено висновок про значне різно маніття у підходах до відповідної процедури. Автором запропоновано влас ний алгоритм залучення конфідента до кримінального провадження.
Посилання
Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine dated April 13, 2012. Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 2013. No. 9-10, 11-12, 13. Art. 8.(in Ukrainian).
Bandurka, O. M., Blazhivskyi, Ye. M., Burdol, Ye. P. (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary: in 2 volumes. Kharkiv. Vol. 1. 768 p. (in Ukrainian).
Honcharenko, V. H., Nor, V. T., Shumylo, M. Ye.(Eds.) (2012). Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Scientific and practical commentary. Kyiv. 1224 p. (in Ukrainian).
Decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court dated Decem-ber 13, 2022 in case No. 991/10566/20. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107897973 (access date 10.04.2023)
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated July 12, 2021 in case No. 757/13635/17. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/98232600 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Resolution of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court dated February 19, 2020 in case No. 295/7911/18. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87826881 (access date 10.04.2023)(in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated May 18, 2022 in case No. 991/10566/20. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104371206 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated March 1, 2023 in case No. 203/94/18. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109276097 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated September 2, 2021 in case No. 349/508/16. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/99349432 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated January 14, 2022 in case No. 369/10079/17. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102623071 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian)
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated September 25, 2020 in case No. 752/4292/16. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91800240 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated March 17, 2021 in case No. 758/1780/17. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/95601523 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated March 22, 2021 in case No. 991/3921/20. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/95786421 (access date 10.04.2023). (in Ukrainian).
Resolution of the Appeals Chamber of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court dated January 11, 2021 in case No. 752/4292/16. Retrieved from:https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/94176224 (access date 10.04.2023)
Verdict of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court dated July 30, 2021 in case No. 752/7440/18/ Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/98685039 (access date 10.04.2023)(in Ukrainian)
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated July 20, 2022 in case No. 161/12522/18. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105339466 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated May 12, 2021 in case No. 757/38626/17. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/96838212 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Talyzina, Ya. O. (2023) The use of confidential cooperation in criminal proceedings: a monograph. Kyiv. 304 p. (in Ukrainian).
Saltykov, S. M. (2017). To the issue of procedural registration by investigators of confidential cooperation in criminal proceedings. To p i c a lproblems of domestic jurisprudence. Issue 6. Vol. 1. P. 128-132. (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated August 10, 2022 in case No. 550/101/18. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105668400 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated February 4, 2022 in case No. 623/2988/18. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102970928 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Resolution of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court dated December 1, 2020 in case No. 318/2921/18. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/93438380 (access date 10.04.2023). (in Ukrainian).
Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court dated August 31, 2022 in case No. 756/10060/17. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106141457 (access date 10.04.2023). (in Ukrainian).
Drozdov, O. M. (2023) To the problem of admissibility of evidence obtained by the prosecutor at the beginning of the pre-trial investigation. Criminal process: modern dimension and prospective trends: IV Kharkiv criminal procedural polylogue, dedicate to the 100th anniversary of the birth dr. law Sciences, Prof. Alpert S. A. «Half a century of service to science and education» (Kharkiv, March 24): collection of articles. Kharkiv P. 85-92. (in Ukrainian).
Verdict of the High Anti-Corruption Court dated October 17, 2022 in case No. 502/1960/17. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106766112 (access date 10.04.2023) (in Ukrainian).