Abstract
The main problems of the presence of people with a forensic examination, which is the most important institution of control over forensic activities. From the standpoint of modern criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine defined procedural and non-procedural circle of people who can implement the presence analyzed the limits of their powers, guaranteeing the independence of the assessor and non-interference in its activities by conducting forensic examinations, formulate proposals to improve their procedural status.
References
Velykyy tlumachnyy slovnyk suchasnoyi ukrayinsʹkoyi movy / [uklad. i hol. red. V.T. Busel]. — K.; Irpinʹ: VTF “Perun”, 2009. — 1736 s.
Shcherbakovskyy M.H. Sudebnyye ekspertyzy: naznacheniye, proizvodstvo, ispolʹzovaniye: ucheb.-prakt. posobye. — KH.: Espanada, 2005. — 544 s.
Yaroslav YU.YU. Orhanizatsiyno-protsesualʹni problemy pryznachennya sudovykh ekspertyz / YU.YU. Yaroslav, O.V. Markhevka // Normatyvno-pravove rehulyuvannya sudovo-ekspertnoyi diyalʹnosti v Ukrayini: materialy nauk.-prakt. konf. — Simferopolʹ, 2000. — S. 140–147.