Features of the preparation of materials and the appointment of forensic portrait examination in criminal proceedings
Banner en_US
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

pre-trial investigatio
criminal proceeding
forensic examination
forensic portrait examination
expert
expert opinion
specialized knowledge
specialis

How to Cite

Kovalenko, V. (2024). Features of the preparation of materials and the appointment of forensic portrait examination in criminal proceedings. Criminalistics and Forensics, (69), 306-318. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2024.69.29

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of the peculiarities of the preparation of materials and the appointment of a forensic portrait exam ination in criminal proceedings. It is noted that forensic portrait examina tion is becoming more and more important and widespread among the procedural means of identification of a person. It is usually appointed in cases where, due to certain circumstances, it is impossible to present a per son for identification, or when such identification has not yielded a positive result. According to the results of summarizing the materials of investiga tive and judicial practice, it was established that one of the conditions for obtaining a positive result from a forensic portrait examination is the proper selection and presentation to the expert of the objects of expert research — video recordings or photographs of the person being identified, and video recordings or photographs of the person, which is compared (checked) with the person being established, i.e. samples for comparative research. The re quirements that the objects of forensic portrait examination must meet are listed: comparability, visibility, reliability and admissibility. The propos al highlighted in the special literature regarding the use of 3D scanning of a person’s face to obtain samples for a comparative study for the needs of forensic portrait examination is supported. Recommendations are given on the procedure for obtaining images of a person for comparative examina tion by photographing and video recording a person’s face in accordance with Art. 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine with the involve ment of a specialist in the field of forensic photography and identification of a person based on appearance, regarding the formulation of questions to an expert when appointing a forensic portrait examination, as well as re garding the indication in the resolution (decision) on the appointment of a forensic portrait examination of data on media that contain objects of ex amination. Improvement of the method of forensic portrait examination is seen as a promising direction of scientific research in this context.

https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2024.69.29
PDF (Українська)

References

Bazhaniuk, V. V. (2023). Legal and Organizational and Tactical Foundations for Conducting Expert Examinations in Criminal Proceedings. Doctor of Philosophy. Kropyvnytskyi, 252 p. [in Ukrainian].

Guseva, V. (2021). Problems of identification of a person on the basis of appearance during the investigation of criminal offenses. Theory and Practice of Forensic Examination and Criminalistics. Iss. 2 (24). Pp. 109—122 [in Ukrainian].

Gusieva, V. O. (2022). Regarding the determination of factors that negatively affect the identification of a person by signs of appearance during the investigation. Theoretical and Applied Problems of Forensic Examination and Criminalistics. Kharkiv. Pp. 41—43 [in Ukrainian].

Malanchuk, P. M., Sokolenko, T. S. (2017). Scientific Provisions of Human Identification by Signs of Appearance. Legal horizons. Iss. 6 (19). Pp. 79—83 [in Ukrainian].

Manko, E. S. (2017). History of Development, Concepts and Theoretical Foundations of Identification of a Person by Signs of Appearance. Criminalistics Bulletin. № 1 (27). Pp. 148—153 [in Ukrainian].

Voloshchuk, T. V. (2010). Requirements for Objects of Forensic Portrait Research. Journal of Kyiv University of Law. Vyp. 2. Pp. 286—289 [in Ukrainian].

On approval of the Instruction on the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and expert studies and Scientific and methodological recommendations on the preparation and appointment of forensic examinations and expert research: order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated 08.10.1998 No. 53/5. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

The verdict of the Kyiv District Court of Kharkiv dated 02.03.2023 in case No. 953/1240/23. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109609026 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

Saltevsky, M. V. (2005). Criminalistics (in modern presentation) : textbook. Kyiv : Kondor. 588 p. [in Ukrainian].

Tishchenko, V. V., Podobnyi, O. O. (2022). Criminalistics: educational and methodological manual. Odesa : Yuridyka. 236 p. [in Ukrainian].

Criminalistics (2017) : textbook: in 2 vols. / Vol. 1 / Ed. A. F. Volobuev, R. L. Stepanyuk, V. O. Malyarova. Kharkiv. 384 p. [in Ukrainian].

Ruling of the Pervomaiskyi City District Court of Mykolaiv Oblast dated 15.09.2022 in case No. 484/111/21. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106278596 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

The verdict of the Uzhhorod City District Court of Zakarpattia Oblast dated 14.03.2023 in case No. 308/14357/22. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109554113 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

Ruling of the Suvorovsky District Court of Odesa dated 22.03.2023 in case No. 523/4516/20. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109713281 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine dated 13.04.2012 No 4651-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text (access date: 05.01.2024) [in Ukrainian].

Kovalenko, A. V. (2022). Kriminalistichne (signaletic) 3D-scanning of human appearance. Bulletin of Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. O. Didorenko. Iss. 3. Pp. 253—262. DOI: 10.33766/2524-0323.99.253-262 [in Ukrainian].

Ruling of the Boryspil City District Court of Kyiv Oblast dated 30.05.2023 in case No. 359/9310/21. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/111360178 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

Ruling of the Zhovtnevyi District Court of Kharkiv dated 23.02.2023 in case No. 639/2084/21. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/109154651 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

Ruling of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Lviv dated 14.07.2023 in case No. 466/6418/21. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/112242249 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].

Ruling of the Sykhivskyi District Court of Lviv dated 19.06.2023 in case No. 464/5083/21. Unified State Register of Court Decisions. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/111716559 (access date: 12.02.2024) [in Ukrainian].