Keywords
object, tasks, stages, features of research (analysis)
research methods
informa- tion (verbal, graphic, structural, special, mathematical) model
How to Cite
Abstract
The article reveals the main aspects and problems of using forensic handwriting examination methods. The purpose of the study is to analyze existing forensic handwriting examination methods, highlight the main problematic issues of their use in the practical activities of forensic experts and present recommendations for improving the results of the study. In particular, the classification of these methods and their common aspects is given; it is indicated that the forensic handwriting examination method can be presented in the form of an information model, and as a complex organizational system, this model can combine other models ‒ elements (subsystems). It is noted that the vast majority of forensic handwriting examination methods were developed on the basis of acquired experience, using empirical and theoretical research methods. At the same time, a significant problem is that the existing methods of forensic handwriting examinations, in particular the mathematical apparatus used, do not allow for a full quantitative assessment of the results of the study, and therefore, to determine the objectivity of the conclusion (conclusions) of the forensic expert (experts) and the consistency of these conclusions regarding the identification (establish-ment) of the person who created the handwritten text, digital records or signature. The practice of expert research requires the use of a more advanced analytical tool that would be based on mathematical dependencies and relationships, and therefore allow for the necessary adequacy to describe the object or process under investigation. The scientific novelty of the study lies in substantiating the need to improve existing methods of forensic handwriting examination by using mathematical modeling (mathematical models and algorithms), as an important tool for quantitative evaluation of research results, which should ensure objectivity, accuracy and consistency of conclusions of forensic experts during commission forensic handwriting examinations, and accordingly, the effectiveness of these examinations as a whole. The conclusions emphasize the importance of improving the mathematical component of forensic handwriting examination methods and using mathematical modeling for this purpose. Attention is focused on the need to assess the consistency of forensic experts’ conclusions and use appropriate research methods for this purpose, in particular Thomas Saatchi’s Hierarchy Analysis Method, which is based on mathematical modeling.
References
Romanchenko I.S., Shuienkin V.O., Shmatok S.O., Ponomarenko L.A. (2016). Praktychnyi posibnyk dlia aspirantiv (adiunktiv) ta zdobuvachiv vchenoho stupenia [Practical guide for postgraduate students, adjuncts and degree seekers]. Kyiv: TsNDI ZS Ukrainy. 128 p. [in Ukrainian].
DNDEKTs MVS Ukrainy. (2008). Metodyka sudovo-pocherkoznavchoi ekspertyzy. Zahalna chastyna [Methodology of forensic handwriting examination. General part]. Kyiv. Registration code 1.1.54 in the Register of Forensic Examination Methods. URL: http://rmpse.minjust.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
DNDEKTs MVS Ukrainy. (2009). Metodyka doslidzhennia pidpysiv [Methodology for examining signatures]. Kyiv. Registration code 1.1.53 in the Register of Forensic Examination Methods. URL: http://rmpse.minjust.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1994). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro sudovu ekspertyzu” vid 25.02.1994 № 4038-XII [Law of Ukraine “On Forensic Examination” dated 25.02.1994 No. 4038-XII]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text (accessed: 03.03.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. (1998). Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsii z pytan pidhotovky ta pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen: Nakaz vid 08.10.1998 № 53/5 [On approval of the Instruction on the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and Scientific and methodological
recommendations on the preparation and appointment of forensic examinations and expert studies: Order dated 08.10.1998 No. 53/5]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text (accessed: 03.03.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Hodz V.S., Bilous I.V., Riabenko I.Yu. (2023). Vidpovidalnist sudovoho eksperta: ohliad chynnoho zakonodavstva [Liability of a forensic expert: an overview of current legislation]. Kryminalistyka I sudova ekspertyza, 68, 84–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2023.68.01 [in Ukrainian].
Hodz V.S., Riabenko I.Yu. (2024). Stroky u sudovii ekspertyzi: problemni pytannia ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia [Time limits in forensic examination: problematic issues and ways to resolve them]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 69, 5–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2024.69.01 [in Ukrainian].
Cheremnova A.I. (Ed.). (2025). Tsyfrova era rozvytku sudovoi ekspertyzy: innovatsiini tekhnolohii ta shtuchnyi intelekt: materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, Odesa, 29 serpnia 2025 r. [The digital era of forensic examination development: innovative technologies and artificial intelligence: proceedings of the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference, Odesa, August 29, 2025]. Odesa:
Yurydyka. 322 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61563/978-617-8574-40-6 [in Ukrainian].
Bandurko V.V. (2019). Problemni aspekty vyznachennia zbyvaiuchykh faktoriv v doslidzhuvanykh pidpysakh, vykonanykh rukopysnym sposobom [Problematic aspects of determining disturbing factors in examined handwritten signatures]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 64, 441–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.39 [in Ukrainian].
Dovzhanytsia R.O. (2019). Doslidzhennia rukopysiv psykhichno khvorykh osib pid chas sudovoi pocherkoznavchoi ekspertyzy [Examination of manuscripts of mentally ill persons during forensic handwriting examination]. Kryminalistychnyi visnyk, 1(31), 35–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37025/1992-4437/2019-31-1-75 [in Ukrainian].
Krasiuk I.P., Sukhomlyn Ya.S., Tarasiuk I.M., Molyboha M.P. (2020). Doslidzhennia pidpysiv, yaki vykonani za dopomohoiu tekhnichnykh pryiomiv ta zasobiv [Examination of signatures made using technical methods and means]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 65, 344–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2020.65.33 [in Ukrainian].
Krasiuk I.P., Lysenko V.V. (2023). Rozvytok i suchasnyi stan vyvchennia problematyky doslidzhennia pidpysiv i korotkykh rukopysnykh zapysiv, vykonanykh za dopomohoiu tekhnichnykh pryiomiv ta zasobiv [Development and current state of studying the issues of examining signatures and short handwritten notes made using technical methods and means]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 68, 321–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2023.68.32 [in Ukrainian].
Lemak E.O. (2023). Zviazok mizh pocherkom ta riznymy aspektamy osobystosti, takymy yak intelekt, kreatyvnist ta emotsiina stiikist [The relationship between handwriting and various aspects of personality, such as intelligence, creativity and emotional stability]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 68, 354–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2023.68.37 [in Ukrainian].
Mamchur O.V. (2021). Doslidzhennia rukopysnykh zapysiv, shcho vykonani na riznykh poverkhniakh pry provedenni sudovoi pocherkoznavchoi ekspertyzy [Examination of handwritten notes made on different surfaces during forensic handwriting examination]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 67, 627–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2021.66.59 [in Ukrainian].
Mantsvetova A.I., Orlova V.F., Slavutska I.A. (2006). Teoretychni pryrodnycho-naukovi osnovy sudovoho pocherkoznavstva [Theoretical natural-scientific foundations of forensic handwriting examination]. Shliakhov A.R. (Ed.). 2nd ed. Kyiv: Nauka. 443 p. [in Ukrainian].
Rohalin S.V. (2019). Zastosuvannia metodu modeliuvannia v doslidnytskii praktytsi sudovykh ekspertyz [Application of the modelling method in the research practice of forensic examinations]. Zahalni polozhennia sudovoi ekspertyzy, 212–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2019 [in Ukrainian].
Dikevych K.H. (2021). Zastosuvannia metodu kibernetychnoho modeliuvannia v zarubizhnii praktytsi pid chas napysannia sudovo-pocherkoznavchykh ekspertyz [Application of the cybernetic modelling method in foreign practice during the preparation of forensic handwriting examinations]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 66, 766–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2021.66.73 [in Ukrainian]. 18. Petrenko S.O. (2021). Zastosuvannia matematychnykh modelei dlia identyfikatsii pocherku v sudovii praktytsi [Application of mathematical models for handwriting identification in judicial practice]. Kryminalistychnyi visnyk, 2, 45–57 [in Ukrainian].
Svoboda Ye.Yu. (2025). Zastosuvannia matematychnoho analizu pry vyznachenni identyfikatsiinykh oznak pocherku: praktychnyi aspekt [Application of mathematical analysis in determining identifying features of handwriting: practical aspect]. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva, 2(42) [in Ukrainian].
Shkriuba S.M. (2025). Matematychnyi analiz pocherku abo pidpysiv: metody ta znachennia [Mathematical analysis of handwriting or signatures: methods and significance]. Aktualni problemy sudovoi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky: tezy dopovidei naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, Poltava, February 14–15, 2025. Poltava, 98 101 [in Ukrainian].
Bilous I.V. (2018). Analiz naukovykh rozrobok shchodo mozhlyvostei provedennia diahnostychnykh doslidzhen rukopysiv, vykonanykh v stani narkotychnoho spianinnia [Analysis of scientific developments regarding the possibilities of conducting diagnostic studies of manuscripts written under narcotic intoxication]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti: materialy kruhloho stolu, prysviachenoho pamiati Z.S. Melenevskoi, Kyiv, February 28, 2018. Kyiv: NAVS, NNI № 2, 15–19 [in Ukrainian].
Dolynkivska S.A., Kyrylenko S.S., Kyrylenko N.D. (2017). Suchasna sudovo-ekspertna praktyka pocherkoznavchoho doslidzhennia rukopysnykh zapysiv, vykonanykh osobamy v stani alkoholnoho spianinnia, yii znachennia dlia kryminalistychnoho zabezpechennia dosudovoho rozsliduvannia i neobkhidnist u rozrobtsi vidpovidnoi metodyky [Modern forensic expert practice of handwriting examination of handwritten notes made by persons under alcohol intoxication, its significance for forensic support of pre-trial investigation and the need to develop an appropriate methodology]. Suchasnyi stan kryminalistychnoho zabezpechennia dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: materialy konferentsii, Kyiv, April 20, 2017. Kyiv: MVS, NAVS, NNI № 2, 146–148 [in Ukrainian].
Sukmanova T.O. (2011). Pro neobkhidnist udoskonalennia metodyky ekspertnoho doslidzhennia pocherkovykh obiektiv, vykonanykh u nezvychnykh zovnishnikh umovakh pysma [On the need to improve the methodology of expert examination of handwriting objects made under unusual external writing conditions]. Kryminalistika i sudebnaia ekspertiza, 56, 29–36 [in Ukrainian].
Sukmaniuk O.O. (2000). Mozhlyvosti identyfikatsii pidpysiv, vykonanykh tekhnichnymy pryiomamy [Possibilities of identifying signatures made using technical methods]. Vykorystannia suchasnykh dosiahnen nauky i praktyky u pidvyshchenni efektyvnosti borotby zi zlochynnistiu: tezy dopovidei naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. Kyiv, 235–237 [in Ukrainian].
Melenevska Z.S., Kilina T.M. (2000). Mozhlyvosti vykorystannia kompiuternoi tekhniky pry doslidzhenni dynamichnykh kharakterystyk nevelykykh za obsiahom pocherkovykh obiektiv [Possibilities of using computer technology in studying the dynamic characteristics of small handwriting objects]. Kryminalistika i sudebnaia ekspertiza, 49, 42–48 [in Ukrainian].