Abstract
The publication presents the results of a study on the specific features of the application of specialized knowledge in judicial and extrajudicial proceedings in the resolution of disputes related to the protection of intellectual property rights. The focus of this study stems from thefact that, in the process of developing an effective and modern system for the protection of intellectual property rights in Ukraine, there is a need to address a number of academic and practical challenges, particularly regarding the refinement of methodological principles for theapplication of specialized knowledge during forensic examinations and extrajudicial expert investigations. The purpose of the study is to analyze the specifics of applying specialized knowledge in judicial and out-of-court proceedings when resolving cases involving the protection of intellectual property rights. The methodological basis of this work consists of general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, generalisation, description, systematisation, etc.) and specialised methods, including the generalisation of practices in forensic expert work. This approach made it possible to comprehensively consider both procedural and non-procedural aspects of the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and expert studies in the field of intellectual property. The scientific novelty of the study lies in a comprehensive approach to improving the methodological foundations for the application of specialized knowledge in conducting forensic examinations and non-pro-cedural expert studies in the field of intellectual property, taking into account the need to create conditions for enhancing the effectiveness of intellectual property rights protection in Ukraine by specialized institutions, as well as for the development of forensic expertise in the field of intellectual property. The conclusions indicate that, in the consideration of disputes related to intellectual property objects, the need for the application of specialized knowledge arises both in judicial proceedings (primarily in civil, commercial, and criminal litigation) and in extrajudicial processes. The necessity of using specialized knowledge within the framework of extrajudicial protection of intellectual property rights may arise in the following cases: suspension of customs clearance of goods suspected of infringing intellectual property rights; consideration of cases involving violations of legislation on the protection of economic competition (in the field of the use of intellectual property objects) by the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine; administrative appeals before the Appeals Chamber of the Ukrainian National Office forIntellectual Property and Innovations against decisions on the acquisition of rights to intellectual property objects, as well as applications for the full or partial invalidation of such rights; mediation procedures and pre-trial dispute resolution in the field of intellectual property; managerial decision-making by company leadership, as well as the assessment by the parties to a dispute of their legal positions, etc.
References
Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (2019). Pro skhvalennia stratehii rozvytku sfery innovatsiinoi diialnosti na period do 2030 roku: rozporiadzhennia vid 10 lypnia 2019 r. № 526-r [On approval of the strategy for the development of the sphere of innovation activity until 2030: Order of July 10, 2019 № 526-r]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/526-2019-%D1%80#n12 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Ministerstvo ekonomiky, dovkillia ta silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy. Proekt Stratehii rozvytku sfery intelektualnoi vlasnosti Ukrainy do 2030 roku [Draft Strategy for the Development of the Intellectual Property Sphere of Ukraine until 2030]. URL: https://me.gov.ua/News/Detail/7a341951-c13d-44b4-8808-b649fa058c1e?lang=uk-UA&title=StrategiaRozvitku (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Holova, I. (2020). Osoblyvosti vykorystannia sotsiolohichnykh opytuvan pry provedenni sudovykh ekspertyz u sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Peculiarities of using sociological interviews in carrying out forensic examinations in the field of intellectual property]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 65, 639–642. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2020.65.62 [in Ukrainian].
Doroshenko, O., Petrenko, V., & Dorozhko, H. (2022). Napriamy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti sudovoi ekspertyzy u spravakh shchodo obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Directions of improvement of efficiency of judicial expertise in cases concerning objects of intellectual property]. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, (1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.33731/12022.258190 [in Ukrainian].
Kisil, N. V. (2021). Sudova ekspertyza obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti v Ukraini: predmet, zavdannia ta mezhi kompetentsii [Forensic investigation of intellectual property objects in Ukraine: subject, tasks and competence]. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk i derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 3(15), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2021-3(15)-28-40 [in Ukrainian].
Klymova, N. (2021). Vyznachennia materialnoi shkody vnaslidok nepravomirnoho vykorystannia vynakhodiv, korysnykh modelei [Establishment of material damage due to illegal use of inventions, useful models]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 66, 994–1004. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2021.66.91 [in Ukrainian].
Krainev, P. P., Kovalova, N. M., Melnikov, M. V. (2008). Sudova ekspertyza u sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Forensic expertise in the field of intellectual property]. Vinnytsia. [in Ukrainian].
Prokhorov-Lukin, H. V. (Ed.). (2006). Metodolohichni osnovy sudovoi ekspertyzy obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti: zvit pro NDR (zakliuchnyi), №0104U003403 [Methodological foundations of forensic expertise of intellectual property objects № 0104U003403. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Petrenko, S. A. (2010). Pravova okhorona kompiuternoi prohramy yak obiekta intelektualnoi vlasnosti: shliakhy rozvytku [Legal protection of computer programs as IP objects: development directions: (Candidate’s thesis)]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Polishchuk, I. Yu. (2020). Kontseptualni osnovy zastosuvannia spetsialnykh znan pid chas rozsliduvannia nezakonnoho vykorystannia torhovelnykh marok [Conceptual foundations of using special knowledge in trademark misuse investigation]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Sopova, K. (2019). Vysnovky ekspertiv, patentnykh povirenykh ta inshykh fakhivtsiv u spravakh shchodo prav na torhovelni marky [Conclusions of experts, patent attorneys and other specialists in cases concerning trademark rights]. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, (1), 50–58. https://doi. org/10.33731/12019.162742 [in Ukrainian].
Struk, I. O., & Kalinichenko, M. M. (2018). Providni pivnichnoamerykanski metodyky doslidzhennia personazhiv yak obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti (za materialamy sudovykh ekspertiv SShA) [Leading North American methods of research on characters as objects of intellectual property (on the basis of materials of usa forensic experts)]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky, 18, 512–518. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2018.59 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorenko, V. L., Chabanets, T. M., & Foia, O. A. (2020). Zabezpechennia mytnym orhanom Ukrainy kontroliu za peremishchenniam tovariv, yaki mistiat oznaky obiektiv prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti: problemy teorii ta praktyky sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen [Providing the customs authority of ukraine the control over the movement of goods that contain signs of intellectual property objects: theory and practice problems of forensic
research]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza, 65, 606–623. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2020.65.60 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorenko, V. L., & Tymoshchyk, L. P. (2019). Sudova ekspertyza z pytan intelektualnoi vlasnosti: henezys, poniattia, klasyfikatsiia ta systema [Forensic examination on intellectual property: genesis, concept, classification and system]. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk i derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1(3), 11–52. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2019-3-1-11-52 (in Ukrainian).
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2016). Pro sudoustrii ta status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02 chervnia 2016 r. № 1402-VIII (zi zminamy ta dopovnenniamy) [On the judiciary and the status of judges: Law of Ukraine of June 2, 2016 No. 1402-VIII. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402 19#Text (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Ministerstvo yustytsii Ukrainy. (1998). Instruktsiia pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen: zatverdzhena nakazom vid 08 zhovtnia 1998 r. № 53/5 (zi zminamy ta dopovnenniamy) [Instruction on the appointment and conduct of forensic expertise and expert research: Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated October 8, 1998 No. 53/5]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#n14 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Ukrainskyi natsionalnyi ofis intelektualnoi vlasnosti ta innovatsii. (2024). Statystyka rozsliduvannia ta rozghliadu sprav z pytan intelektualnoi vlasnosti za 2019–2023 rr. [Statistics of investigation and adjudication of intellectual property cases for 2019–2023]. URL: https://nipo.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Statystyka_rozsliduvannia_ta_rozhliadu_sprav_z_pytan_intelektualnoi-web.pdf (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Okruzhnyi administratyvnyi sud mista Kyieva. (2014, April 7). Postanova u spravi № 826/7953/13-a [Decision in case No. 826/7953/13-a]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/38071038 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Okruzhnyi administratyvnyi sud mista Kyieva. (2016, March 23). Ukhvala u spravi № 826/17249/14 [Ruling in case No. 826/17249/14]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56975628 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (2012). Mytnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon vid 13 bereznia 2012 r. № 4495-VI (zi zminamy ta dopovnenniamy) [Customs Code of Ukraine: Law of March 13, 2012 No. 4495-VI (as amended)]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4495-17#Text (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Verkhovnyi Sud. (2020, February 6). Postanova u spravi № 910/2503/18 [Decision in case No. 910/2503/18]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87426709 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Ternopilskyi miskraionnyi sud Ternopilskoi oblasti. (2012, September 12). Postanova u spravi № 1915/14354/2012 [Decision in case No. 1915/14354/2012]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/25970359 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Shevchenkivskyi raionnyi sud mista Kyieva. (2024, July 29). Postanova u spravi № 761/21623/24 [Decision in case No. 761/21623/24]. URL: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/121382077/ (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Vinnytskyi miskyi sud Vinnytskoi oblasti. (2025, February 18). Postanova u spravi № 127/18319/24 [Decision in case No. 127/18319/24]. URL: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/125429104/ (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Hospodarskyi sud Lvivskoi oblasti. (2013, June 26). Rishennia u spravi № 5015/2463/11 [Judgment in case No. 5015/2463/11]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/32112819 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. (1996). Pro zakhyst vid nedobrosovisnoi konkurentsii: Zakon Ukrainy vid 07 chervnia 1996 r. № 236/96-VR (zi zminamy ta dopovnenniamy) [On protection against unfair competition: Law of Ukraine of June 7, 1996 No. 236/96-VR (as amended)]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/236/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Antymonopolnyi komitet Ukrainy. (1994). Poriadok rozghliadu Antymonopolnym komitetom Ukrainy ta yoho terytorialnymy viddilenniamy zaiav i sprav pro porushennia zakonodavstva pro zakhyst ekonomichnoi konkurentsii: rozporiadzhennia vid 19 kvitnia 1994 r. № 5 [Procedure for consideration by the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and its territorial offices of applications and cases on violations of legislation on protection of economic competition: Order of April 19, 1994 No. 5]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0090-94#Text (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Antymonopolnyi komitet Ukrainy. (2025). Zvit pro diialnist Antymonopolnoho komitetu Ukrainy za 2025 rik [Report on the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for 2025]. URL: https://amcu.gov.ua/static-objects/amcu/uploads/public/69b/bee/9e4/69bbee9e467f5822420304.pdf (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Antymonopolnyi komitet Ukrainy. (2020, November 12). Pro porushennia zakonodavstva pro zakhyst vid nedobrosovisnoi konkurentsii ta nakladennia shtrafu: rishennia № 720-r u spravi № 127-26.4/96-16 [On violation of legislation on protection against unfair competition and imposition of a fine: Decision No. 720-r in case No. 127-26.4/96-16]. URL: https://amcu.gov.ua/npas/pro-porushennya-zakonodavstva-pro-zahist-vid-nedobrosovisnoyi-konkurenciyi-ta-nakladennya-shtrafu-17 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Antymonopolnyi komitet Ukrainy. (2025, September 4). Pro porushennia zakonodavstva pro zakhyst vid nedobrosovisnoi konkurentsii ta nakladennia shtrafu: rishennia № 473-r u spravi № 127-26.4/22-25 [On violation of legislation on protection against unfair competition and imposition of a fine: Decision No. 473-r in case No. 127-26.4/22-25]. URL: https://amcu.gov.ua/npas/pro-porushennia-zakonodavstva-pro-zakhyst-vid-nedobrosovisnoi-konkurentsii-ta-nakladennia-shtrafu-30 (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Ukrainskyi natsionalnyi ofis intelektualnoi vlasnosti ta innovatsii. (2025, October 27). Rishennia Apeliatsiinoi palaty [Decision of the Appeals Chamber] (in Ukrainian). URL: https://nipo.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Rishennia-ALVANURI.pdf (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].
Ukrainskyi natsionalnyi ofis intelektualnoi vlasnosti ta innovatsii. (2025, October 23). Rishennia Apeliatsiinoi palaty [Decision of the Appeals Chamber]. URL: https://nipo.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Rishennia_LENTNOX.pdf (accessed: 01.04.2026) [in Ukrainian].