Abstract
The peculiarity of the issues discussed in this article is the study of situational expertise as a type of forensic research. The team of authors consider situational forensic expertise in terms of explosives expertise because this type of research is quite specific. Practice shows that not all participants in the criminal process equally understand the importance of studying the issue related to the situational explosive expertise. There are many examples of errors in the appointment of situational explosive technical expertise, in solving questions by experts during the performance of this type of expertise. However, the most difficult issue is the collection and provision of objects (materials) for expert research. Special attention should be paid to this because based on the results of the situational study, the court makes an important decision on the punishment of the guilty. Carrying out the analysis of the current state of situational expert studies in the sense of appointing and conducting forensic explosive expertise will improve the quality of the investigation of crimes related to the use of explosive devices, ammunition and explosives. The article determines that a feature of the situational explosive expertise is that by its nature, in most cases, it should be a comprehensive forensic expertise. When conducting situational explosive expertise, the results of investigative (search) actions related to the study of the situation at the scene of the incident should be taken into account. The subject of situational explosive expertise is incidents specifically related the subject of confirmation. Situational explosive expertise is distinguished by the complex and multi-stage nature of the tasks being solved, determined by the specific features of the objects of study, which are multi-component events. Situational explosive expertise is carried out on the basis of the versions put forward by the investigation and the court. When conducting a situational explosive expertise, the results of an inspection of the scene of the incident are used, and in most cases of other investigative (detective) actions, including an investigative experiment, the conclusions of experts regarding previously conducted forensic expertise are taken into account.
References
Honcharenko, V. H., Hora, I. V. (Eds.) (2015) Expertise in the judiciary of Ukraine. Clarification. Legislation. Judicial practice. Bulletin of legislation and legal practice of Ukraine. Kyiv. No. 5-6. P. 14 (in Ukrainian).
On Forensic Expertise: Law of Ukraine dated February 25, 1994 No. 4038-XII (amended and supplemented). Retrieved from: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12/conv (access date 31.05.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Ukraine and Poland: a comparative study: monograph. Lviv. 272 p.(in Ukrainian).
Bilodid, I. K. (Ed.) (1978). Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: in 11 volumes. Volume 9. 916 p. (in Ukrainian).
Klymenko, N. I. (2007). Forensic expert-ise. Course of lectures: education manual. Kyiv. 528 p. (in Ukrainian).
Afonin, D. S. (2014). The value of situational forensic examinations in the investigation of crimes. South Ukrainian legal journal. P.148-150 (in Ukrainian).
Prokhorov-Lukin, H. V. (1993). Theoret-ical and methodical foundations of forensic situational analysis: extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis of Juridical Sciences: 12.00.09. Kyiv. 217 р. (in Ukrainian).
Koliad, P. V. (Ed.) (2008). Methodical guide for employees of pre-trial investigation bodies on the appointment and conduct of forensic examination. Kyiv. 278 p. (in Ukrainian).
Bondarchuk, V. V., Lyseiuk, A. M. Expert support for detection and assessment of damages caused by war crimes. Retrieved from: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/2010/38959/Ovsh_22-4.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (access date 31.05.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Instructions on the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and expert studies in the system of the Security Service of Ukraine. The list of indicative issues that are resolved by experts of expert divisions of the Security Service of Ukraine during forensic examinations and expert studies: approved. by the order of the Central Security Service of Ukraine No. 371 of May 29, 2015. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0738-15#n339 (access date 31.05.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Ishchenko, A. V., Kobets, M. V. (2005). Methodology of expert investigation of explosive objects. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. Kyiv. No.1.P. 278-286 (in Ukrainian).
Register of methods of conducting forensic examinations. Retrieved from: https://rmpse.minjust.gov.ua (access date 31.05.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Shepitko, V. Yu. Criminalistics: Glossary of terms. Retrieved from: https://jurkniga.ua/contents/kriminalistika-slovnik-terminiv.pdf (access date 31.05.2023) (in Ukrainian).
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2018). The essence, structure and purposes of using special knowledge in judicial proceedings. Theory and practice of forensic examination and criminalistics. P. 184-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2018.20 (in Ukrainian).
Piliukov, Yu. (2020). Use of special knowledge in criminal proceedings. Current problems of jurisprudence. No. 4. P. 240-245. (in Ukrainian).