Forensic examination of the system of measure, as a source of forensic evidence in criminal, civil and commercial litigation
Banner en_US
No. 60 (2015), General issues of criminalistics and forensics
No. 60 (2015)

Forensic examination of the system of measure, as a source of forensic evidence in criminal, civil and commercial litigation

General issues of criminalistics and forensics
Published December 14, 2015
О. Hrychyna
Zaporizhzhia Branch of the Dnipropetrovsk Research Institute of Forensic Examinations of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

Forensic examination of the system of measure, as a source of forensic evidence in criminal, civil and commercial litigation

How to Cite

HrychynaО. (2015). Forensic examination of the system of measure, as a source of forensic evidence in criminal, civil and commercial litigation. Criminalistics and Forensics, (60), 135-146. Retrieved from https://digest.kndise.gov.ua/index.php/KISE/article/view/971
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

One of the main ways to provide the court and the investigating bodies of evidence is a judicial examination and obtain, as a result of its implementation, the expert. The assessment, structure and probative value of expert opinion to this day remains certain. Gaining importance the determination of characteristics of the expert evaluation stakeholders proceedings.

The aim of the article is to define the content probative value of expert opinion, the selection of features and research evaluation of expert opinion as court evidence developing practical recommendations for judicial and investigative bodies to assess expert opinion on the system of evidence during the criminal, civil and commercial litigation.

The article deals with the role of forensics in the system of evidence during the criminal, civil and commercial litigation. The content probative value of expert opinion as characteristics that reflect its place in the other evidence. Highlight features of the study and evaluation of the expert as court evidence. The paper identifies the key criteria for evaluating the conclusion of legal expertise and essence of each criterion with specific actions necessary to carry out the court or investigating for a comprehensive, full, immediate and impartial evaluation of the expert. Practical recommendations for judicial and investigative bodies to assess the expert forensic evidence in the system.

PDF (Українська)

References

Orlov, Yu. K. (2009). Problemy teorii dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurist", 175 s.

Shakaryan, M. S. (Ed.). (1993). Grazhdanskiy protsess. M.: Yurid. lit., 559 s.

Vas'kovskiy, Ye. V. (2003). Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. Krasnodar, 295 s.

Vasil'yev, S. V. (2013). Tsyvil'nyy protses Ukrayiny: navch. posibnyk. K.: Tsentr uchbovoyi lit., 344 s.

Orlov, Yu. K. (1985). Zaklyucheniye eksperta kak istochnik vyvodnogo znaniya v sudebnom dokazyvanii (ugolovno-protsessual'nyye, kriminalisticheskiye i logiko-gnoseologicheskiye problemy) (Avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk). M., 54 s.

Chernadchuk, V. D., Sukhonos, V. V., Nagrebel'nyy, V. P., & Luk’yanets', D. M. (2008). Hospodars'ke protsesual'ne pravo: pidruchnyk / za zah. red. V. D. Chernadchuka. Sumy: VTD «Universytet. knyha», 378 s.

Kovalenko, V. V., Udalova, L. D., & Pis'mennyy, D. P. (2013). Kryminal'nyy protses: pidruchnyk / za zah. red. V. V. Kovalenka, L. D. Udalovoyi, D. P. Pis'mennoho. K.: Tsentr uchbovoyi lit., S. 137–139.

Belkin, A. R. (1999). Teoriya dokazyvaniya: nauch.-metod. posob. M.: Norma, 418 s.

Tsyvil'nyy protsesual'nyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 18.03.2004 r. № 1618-IV. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15.

Hospodars'kiy protsesual'niy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 06.11.1991 r. № 1798-XII. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12.

Kryminal'niy protsesual'niy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651-VI. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17.