Міжвідомчий Науково-методичний збірник
"Криміналістика і судова експертиза"
ISSN: 2786-7072 (Online); ISSN: 2786-7080 (Print)
PDF 18 Завантажень: 53, розмiр: 275.8 KB

I. Basysta


Expert’s conclusions are one of the procedural sources of evidence provided by the current CPC, while for their receipt, the parties to the criminal proceedings in different periods were given excellent powers, the implementation of which also differentiated. Nowadays it produces new challenges for this activity, and the legislator does not always respond in a timely manner to such a dynamics.

Existing to date, the exclusively judicial procedure for the appointment of examinations in criminal proceedings is a guarantee of an excessive burden on investigative judges, which may entail the ineffectiveness of the pre-trial investigation as a whole, since it will be necessary to appoint annually about 800 thousand examinations that paralyze the judicial system and pre-trial investigation. Therefore, it is worth returning to the original order of appointment of examinations for the CPС in 2012.