Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The algorithms of calculation of material damage, as a result of violation of rights on a trademark, by the basic methods of profitable evaluation approach, that is used for implementation of judicial examinations were investigated in the article. There was given generalized estimation of practical application of the indicated approaches and methods of judicial conclusions and examinations. A requirement is reasonable in development of expert methodology of determining size of material damage because of violation of rights on a trademark that must include adapted to realization of judicial examinations universal algorithms of calculations.References
Otsinka maynovykh prav intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti: postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 03.10.2007 r. № 1185 Pro zatverdzhennya Natsionalʹnoho standartu № 4 // Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. — 2007. — № 75 (15.10.2007). — St. 2792.
Pro otsinku mayna, maynovykh prav ta profesiynu otsinochnu diyalʹnistʹ v Ukrayini: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 12.07.2001 r., № 2658-III // Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. — 2001. — № 47 (23.11.2001). — St. 251, zi zminamy ta dop.
Butnik-Siversʹkyy O.B. Teoretychni peredumovy vyznachennya rozmiru zbytkiv vid porushennya maynovykh prav intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti / O.B. Butnik-Siversʹkyy // Intelektualʹna vlasnistʹ. — 2013. — № 6. — S. 32–42.
Yefymov A.N. Otsenka ushcherba ot rasprostraneniya kontrafaktnykh kopiy programm / A.N. Yefymov [Elektronnyy resurs] // Moskovskyy otsenshchyk. — 2000. — № 5. — Rezhym dostupu: http://www.valnet.ru/m7-26.phtml
Lynnyk N.V. Opredeleniye ushcherba ot narusheniya patenta / N.V. Lynnyk, V.B. Shakhnovskaya; pod red. H.V. Bromberha. — M.: VNYYPY, 1994. — 46 s.
Rusma Dzh. Analiz upushchennoy vyhody i ekonomicheskoho ushcherba ot narusheniya prav intelektualʹnoy sobstvennosti / Dzh. Rusma, Dzh. Kerr i R. Reyli // Business Valuations Guide. — 2007. — № 1. — S. 158–175.
Smyt H.V. Otsenka tovarnykh znakov / H.V. Smyt; per. s anhl. Byuro perevodov ROYD. — M.: YD “KVYNTO-KONSALTYNH”, 2010. — 384 s.
Instruktsiya pro pryznachennya ta provedennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ ta Naukovo-metodychni rekomendatsiyi z pytanʹ pidhotovky ta pryznachennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ zatverdzhena Nakazom Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny vid 8 zhovtnya 1998 r. № 53/5 (u redaktsiyi nakazu Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny vid 02 sichenya 2013 r. № 1/22533) // Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. — 2013. — № 3 (22.01.2013). — St. 91.
Tsyvilʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny, vid 16.01.2003 r., № 435-IV // Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. — 2003. — №№ 40–44. — St. 356, zi zminamy ta dop.
Pro deyaki pytannya praktyky vyrishennya sporiv, pov’yazanykh iz zakhystom prav intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti: postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho hospodarsʹkoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 17 zhovtnya 2012 r. № 12 // Yurydychnyy visnyk Ukrayiny. — 2012. — № 46.
Kozyrev A.N. Otsenka stoymosty nemateryalʹnykh aktyvov i intelektualʹnoy sobstvennosty / A.N. Kozyrev, V.L. Makarov — M.: Interreklama, 2003. — 352 s.
Azhalʹdov H.H. Voznahrazhdeniye za ispolʹzovaniye intelektualʹnoy sobstvennosty [Elektronnyy resurs] / H.H. Azhalʹdov, N.N. Karpova // Moskovskyy otsenshchyk. — Rezhym dostupu http://www.valnet.ru/m7-61.phtml.
Zahalʹni zasady otsinky mayna i maynovykh prav: natsionalʹnyy standart № 1 zatverdzhenyy Postanovoyu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrayiny vid 10.09.2003 r. № 1440 // Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny. — 2003. — № 37 (26.09.2003). — st. 1995.