Keywords
legal process
forensic expert practice
expert assessment
proof
identification
How to Cite
Abstract
In this article authors touch the problems upon the expert activities, related to the evaluation of the results of the conducted researches and the reflection of these results and the expert’s conclusions regarding the proof of conclusions, analyzing the judicial practice of different countries. Explains the reasons for the different approaches of judicial experts to this part of the methodological and legal requirements and their impact on the judicial process as a whole. The authors present the results of the analysis of forensic practice of their own state. Emphasis in work is placed on the need for proper presentation of the stage of evaluation of research results when drawing up an expert opinion, so, how exactly at this stage the expert analysis is done, on the basis of the fundamental knowledge of scientific identification, diagnosis and proof. Also, the authors suggest ways to address the issues discussed.
References
Sorin, A. idr. (2013). Problematika kriminalisticheskikh ekspertiz. [The problem of forensic examinations] Kluzh (Rumyniia)
Averianiva, T. V. (2015). Sudebnaia ekspertiza: kurs obshchei teorii. [Forensic examination: general theory course]. Moskva, P.428–477. [in Russian].
Orlov, Iu. K. (1995). Zakliuchenie eksperta i ego otsenka [Expert opinion and assessment]: ucheb. posob. Moskva, 64 p. [in Russian].
Ekspert: ruk. dlia ekspertov organov vnutrennikh del i iustitsii.(2003). [Expert: manual for experts of agencies of Internal Affairs and Justice]. Moskva, p. 327. [in Russian].
URL: http://adhdportal.com/book_2151_chapter_30_.
Zakon No 68 [Law No 68] ot 14.04.2016 g., o sudebnoi ekspertize i statuse sudebnogo eksperta R.M., UPK, GPK RM, Ukrainy, Rossiiskoi Federatsii; Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 2/2000 privind organizarea activităţii de expertiză tehnică judiciarăşi extrajudiciară, aprobată prin Legea nr. 156/2002, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, precum şi în conformitate cu prevederile Codului de procedură civilă, respectiv Codului de procedură penală. ORDONANŢĂ nr.75 din 24 august 2000 рrivind autorizarea experţilor criminalişti, România. [in Russian].
Materialy zasedanii Nauchno-metodicheskogo Soveta pri Natsionalnom Tsentre Sudebnykh Ekspertiz Ministerstva Iustitsii respubliki Moldova za 2016 – fevral 2019. [Materials of the meetings of the Scientific and Methodological Council at the National Center for Judicial Examinations of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Moldova for 2016-February 2019.] [in Russian].