Choreographic works as objects of forensic expertise: key features and approaches to solving expert tasks
Banner en_US
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

choreographic works
forms of work
expert practice
objects of copyright

How to Cite

Kisil, N. (2019). Choreographic works as objects of forensic expertise: key features and approaches to solving expert tasks. Criminalistics and Forensics, (64), 791 - 803. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.74

Abstract

A research aim was to investigate signs peculiar to choreographic works, as objects of copyright. Will consider, what elements of choreographic results can be attributed to maintenance, and also internal and external forms, and also to offer approach to the decision of set certain tasks. Identification of the main features of choreographic works has a special relevance for the methodological provision of forensic expert activity.

It was established that the main tasks of the forensic expertise of choreographic works are: the definition of the object of copyright law in the object of research; definition in the object of the research or its part of signs of originality and creative nature; establishing the fact of reproduction of a choreographic work; establishing a method for its use or processing.

The results of the conducted research indicate that the elements of the internal form of choreographic works may include the artistic image, composition, structure of the work. The elements of the external form – the choreographic work of the work (choreographic vocabulary of the work, style of speech), that is, the author's own means and techniques of creating artistic images, with which plastic dance images are created.

During realization of expertise it is expedient to investigate the next elements of choreographic language works: composition of motions, gestures, poses, mimicry; harmoniousness of motions and poses, plastic expressiveness and mimicry, rate and rhythm of motion, spatial picture; light and colour decisions; stage sceneries, suits, make-up and hair-dos of actors; individual style of motion (handwriting of motions) etc.

At establishment of fact of the complete or partial use of choreographic work an expert on the stage of comparative research conducts the analysis of language elements of the investigated works, methods of their selection, use, mutual combination and correlation. The elements of maintenance and form of these works are thus analysed, in particular, features of expression of their internal and external form.

In the process of research the special attention applies on facts that can testify to more early use by other authors of analogical choreographic elements. It also establishes the originality of the used choreographic vocabulary of the work, means and methods of creating artistic images.

https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.74
PDF (Українська)

References

Metodyka provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz literaturnykh tvoriv: zvit pro NDR (zakliuch.) MYuU, NDTsSEPIV; ker. K. O. Samirov; vykon.: N. V. Kisil [ta in.]. No DR 0109U003647 [Methodology for conducting forensic examinations of literary works: report on research work (concluding) of MYuU, NDTSSEPIV; performed by K. O. Samirov; executed: N.V. Kisil [and others.]]. Kyiv, 2011. 92 p.

Metodolohichni osnovy sudovoi ekspertyzy obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti: zvit pro NDR (zaklyuch.) MYuU, KNDISE, KHNDISE; ker. H. V. Prohorov-Lukin; vykon.: A. V. Andrieieva [ta in.]. No DR 0104U003403 [Methodological foundations of forensic examination of intellectual property objects: report on research work (concluding) of MYuU, KNDISE, KhNSISE; headed by H. V. Prokhorov-Lukin; executed: A.V. Andrieieva [and others]. No. DR 0104U003403]. Kyiv, 2006. 290 p.

Kisil, N. V. (2016). Teoretychni ta metodolohichni osnovy sudovoi ekspertyzy literaturnykh ta khudozhnikh tvoriv yak obiektiv avtorskoho prava [Theoretical and methodological foundations of forensic examination of literary and artistic works as objects of copyright]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza: mizhvid. nauk.-metod. zb. [Criminalistics and forensic examination: interdepartmental scientific and methodical collection]. Kyiv, Issue 61. pp. 478–487.

Edynyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [Unified Registry of Judgments]. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Page/1 (application date 25.03.2019).

Pro avtorske pravo i sumizhni prava: zakon Ukrainy vid 23 grud. 1993 r. No 3792-XII [On Copyright and Related Rights: Law of Ukraine of December 23. 1993 No 3792-XII]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 1994. No 13. St. 64 [Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. 1994. No. 13. Art. 64]

Bernska konventsiia pro okhoronu literaturnykh i khudozhnikh tvoriv [Berne Convention on the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works]. Zibrannia chynnykh mizhnarodnykh dohovoriv Ukrainy. 2006. No 5. St. 1247 [Collection of current international treaties of Ukraine. 2006. No. 5. Art. 1247].

Orliuk, O. P., Androshchuk, H.O., Butnik-Siverskyi, О.B. (2007). Pravo intelektualnoi vlasnosti: akad. kurs: pidruch. ta in. [Intellectual Property Right: acad. course: a textbook]. Kyiv, 696 p.

Pravo intelektualnoi vlasnosti: nauk.-prakt. komentar do Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Intellectual Property Law: Sciences. Pract. Commentary on the Civil Code of Ukraine]. Kyiv, 2006. 432 p.

Smirnova, V. M. Khoreohraficheskoe proizvedenie kak obekt avtorskoho prava [Choreographic work as an object of copyright]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/horeograficheskoe-proizvedenie-kak-obekt-avtorskogo-prava. (application date 20.03.2019).

Pro zastosuvannia sudamy norm zakonodavstva u spravakh pro zakhyst avtorskoho prava i sumizhnykh prav. Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho sudu Ukrainy No 5 vid 04.06.2010 [On the application by courts of the norms of the legislation in matters of protection of copyright and related rights. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine No. 5 dated 04.06.2010.]. URL:https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0005700-10. (application date 20.03.2019).

Ionas, V. Ya. (1972). Proizvedeniia tvorchestva v hrazhdanskom prave [Works of art in civil law]. Moscow, 168 p.

Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: [v 11 t.] [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: [in 11 volumes]]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1974. Vol. 5. 840 p.

Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (z dod., dopov. ta CD) [Comprehensive explanatory dictionary of contemporary Ukrainian language (with annexes, add.,and CD).]. Kyiv, Irpin, 2005. 1728 p.

Melnikov, V. (2008). Tolkovanie sudami ponyatiia «originalnoe proizvedenie» [Interpretation by courts of the concept ‘original work’]. Intellektualnaia sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [Intellectual property. Copyright and Related Rights] No9. pp. 46–53.

Entsyklopediia intelektualnoi vlasnosti/za red. prof. P. P. Krainieva [Encyclopedia of Intellectual Property / ed. prof. P. P. Krainev.]. Kyiv, 2012. 660 p.

Sanchenko, O. I. (2013). Khoreohrafichnyi tvir yak obiekt avtorskoho prava. Prioritetni napriamky rozvytku pravovoi systemy Ukrainy: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Donetsk, 25-26 zhovt. 2013 r.) [Choreographic work as an object of copyright. Priority directions of the development of the legal system of Ukraine: materials of the international scientific practical conf. (Donetsk, October 25-26, 2013)] Kherson, 164 с.

Kondrateva, E. (2011). Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniia otdelnykh obektov avtorskikh prav [Problems of legal regulation of certain objects of copyright]. Intellektualnaia sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava No 3. pp. 22–29.

Kirsanova, K. (2011). Pravo i tanets: chto? gde? kogda? [Law and dance: what? where? when?] // Intellektualnaia sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [Intellectual property. Copyright and related rights]. No 5. pp. 60–66.

Brumshtein, Yu., Aksenova, Yu. (2011). Tantsevalnye nomera: analiz osobennostei s pozitsii avtorskogo i smezhnykh prav [Dance performances: analysis of features from the point of view of copyright and related rights]. Intellektualnaia sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. [Intellectual property. Copyright and related rights.] No 8. pp. 3–18.

Smirnova, V. M. (2011). Khoreograficheskoe proizvedenie kak obekt avtorskogo prava [Choreographic work as an object of copyright]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian law] No12. pp. 102–111.

Tarasov, N. I. (1971). Klassicheskii tanets [Classic dance]. Moscow, p. 3.

Kirsanova, K. (2012). Khoreograficheskoe proizvedenie, ego postanovka i ispolnenie kak obekty intellektualnykh prav [Choreographic works, its formulation and performance as objects of intellectual rights]. Intellektualnaia sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava [Intellectual property. Copyright and related rights] No12. pp. 35–43.