Consultative function of a specialist in criminal proceedings
Banner en_US
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

Consultative function of a specialist in criminal proceedings

How to Cite

ShcherbakovskyiМ. (2017). Consultative function of a specialist in criminal proceedings. Criminalistics and Forensics, (62), 43-51. Retrieved from https://digest.kndise.gov.ua/index.php/KISE/article/view/810

Abstract

Consultations of persons who have special knowledge are traditionally implemented during the investigation of crimes. In the current CPC of Ukraine, the use of special knowledge in the form of obtaining consultations and explanations of a specialist has acquired legislative fixing. Taking into account the content of concepts, the necessity of uniform application of procedural terminology, it is expedient to use the term “explanation” instead of the terms “consultation” and “elucidation” in the law. The specialist in the form of explanations provides the parties and the court with certificates and consultations. The reference contains special general information without reference to the circumstances of the criminal proceedings. Consultation is a council, expert opinion, which is provided to the requestor on the basis of familiarization with the materials of criminal proceedings and concerns circumstances directly related to the investigated event. The specialist does not replace the expert, because his explanations are not based on the study of objects and do not matter the proof. The specialist provides explanations either verbally or in writing in the process and outside the conduct of investigative (investigative) or judicial actions. The meaning of oral explanations during the conduct of investigative actions is that the investigator receives promptly qualified assistance on special issues. The oral explanations of a specialist help the investigator to evaluate the evidence, timely decide on the appointment of an expert examination, and determine the questions to the expert. The written form has explanations that are attached to the procedural protocol in which the specialist participated and the explanations that are made out during the trial. Analysis of the current procedural law, investigative and judicial practice testifies to the admissibility of obtaining explanations from a specialist on legal issues. The current CPC provides for the possibility of providing legal assistance to professional participants in criminal proceedings. Specialists of the Scientific Advisory Council under the Supreme Court of Ukraine shall provide the judge-rapporteur of the Supreme Court of Ukraine with a scientific conclusion regarding the relevant rule of law. Providing explanations for special and legal issues is a direct embodiment of the advisory function of a specialist. The ultimate purpose of using explanations is to justify the parties, the court adopting procedural and organizational and tactical decisions.

PDF (Українська)

References

Kovalenko V. V. Zastosuvannya naukovo-tekhnichnykh zasobiv spetsialistamy pry provedenni slidchykh diy: monohr. / Luhansʹk. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav. Luhansʹk. 2007. 248 s.

Kravchenko O. A. Zastosuvannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ pid chas zbyrannya, doslidzhennya ta vykorystannya rechovykh dokaziv: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 / Klasychnyy pryvatnyy un-t. Zaporizhzhya. 2012. 212 s.

Romanyuk B. V. Suchasni teoretychni ta pravovi problemy vykorystannya spetsialʹnykh znanʹ u dosudovomu slidstvi: dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 / Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav. Kyyiv, 2002. 222 s.

Pyrih I. V. Teoretyko-prykladni problemy ekspertnoho zabezpechennya dosudovoho rozsliduvannya: monohr. / Dnipropetr. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav Dnipropetrovsʹk, 2015. 432 s.

Velykyy tlumachnyy slovnyk suchasnoyi ukrayinsʹkoyi movy / uporyad. i holov. red. V. T. Busel. Kyyiv; Irpinʹ, 2007. 1736 s.

Fastovetsʹ V. Spivvidnoshennya ponyatʹ «pokazannya» ta «poyasnennya» u kryminalʹnomu protsesualʹnomu kodeksi Ukrayiny // Visnyk Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi prokuratury Ukrayiny. 2014. № 2 (35). S. 79–85.

Krutʹ O. V., Nadhornyy H.M. Pytannya dovidkovoyi ta konsulʹtatsiynoyi diyalʹnosti naukovo-doslidnykh ustanov sudovykh ekspertyz Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny // Normatyvno-pravove rehulyuvannya sudovo-ekspertnoyi diyalʹnosti v Ukrayini: materialy nauk.-prakt. konf. Simferopolʹ. 2000. S. 33–36.

Éntsyklopedyya sudebnoy ékspertyzy / pod red. T. V. Averʹyanovoy, E. R. Rossynskoy. Moskva, 1999. 552 s.

Zynyn A. M. Uchastye spetsyalysta v protsessualʹnykh deystvyyakh. Moskva, 2011. 160 s.

Lukʹyanchykov E. D. Lukʹyanchykov B. E. Yspolʹzovanye spetsyalʹnykh znanyy po novomu UPK Ukrayny // Krymynalystyka y sudebnaya ékspertyza: mezhved. nauch.-metod. sb. Kyyiv, 2013. Vyp. 58. CH. 1. S. 61–69.

Instruktsiya pro poryadok zaluchennya pratsivnykiv orhaniv dosudovoho rozsliduvannya politsiyi ta Ekspertnoyi sluzhby Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrayiny yak spetsialistiv dlya uchasti v provedenni ohlyadu mistsya podiyi: nakaz MVS Ukrayiny № 1339 vid 3.11.2015. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhym dostupu: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1392-15.

Skorchenko P. T. Krymynalystyka. Tekhnyko-krymynalystycheskoe obespechenye rassledovanyya prestuplenyy: posob. Moskva, 1999. 272 s.

Toropov S. O. Poperedni ta ekspertni balistychni doslidzhennya na mistsi podiyi: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 / Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav. Kharkiv. 2011. 243 s.

Marchak V. YA. Konsulʹtatsiyi ta rozʼyasnennya spetsialista yak novela v kryminalʹnomu protsesualʹnomu zakonodavstvi Ukrayiny // Mytna sprava. 2013. № 2 (86). CH.2. Kn.1. S. 100–105.

Polozhennya pro Naukovo-konsulʹtatyvnu radu pry Verkhovnomu Sudi Ukrayiny: postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 16 veresnya 2011 roku № 5: zi zminamy, vnesen. Vidpovid. do postanov Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrayiny vid 23 travnya 2014 roku № 6; vid 29 travnya 2015 roku № 9; vid 16 veresnya 2016 roku № 15. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhym dostupu: http://www.scourt.gov.ua/clients/vsu/vsu.nsf/(documents)/6F61F38F4489920CC2257ADB00324AE0.

Shcherbakovsʹkyy M. H. Provedennya ta vykorystannya sudovykh ekspertyz u kryminalʹnomu provadzheni: monohr. Kharkiv. V dele. 2015. 560 s.

Kurylenko D. V. Instytut obiznanykh osib u zmahalʹnomu kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 / Kharkivsʹk. un-t vnutr. sprav Kharkiv, 2017. 256 s.

Mokhov A. A. Prezumptsyya «sudʹy znayut pravo» — rudyment pravovoy doktryny? // Ékspert-krymynalyst. Moskva, 2007. № 1. S. 3–7.

Shepytʹko V. YU. O predelakh yspolʹzovanyya spetsyalʹnykh znanyy v uholovnom protsesse // Aktualʹni problemy kryminalʹnoho prava, protsesu ta kryminalistyky: mater. IV mizhn. nauk.-prak. konf., prysvyachenoyi 95-richchyu z dnya narodzhennya prof. M. V. Saltevsʹkoho (m. Odesa, 2 lystopada 2012 r.). Odesa, 2012. S. 499–502.

Hroshevyy YU. Problemy udoskonalennya zakonodavstva, shcho rehulyuye kryminalʹno-protsesualʹnu diyalʹnistʹ // Visnyk Nats. akad. prav. nauk Ukrayiny. Kharkiv. 2003. № 2 (33), № 3 (34). S. 686–698.

Sorokotyahyn Y. N. Systemno-strukturnaya kharakterystyka spetsyalʹnykh poznanyy y formy ykh yspolʹzovanyya v borʹbe s prestupnostʹyu // Prymenenye spetsyalʹnykh poznanyy v borʹbe s prestupnostʹyu: sb. nauch. tr. / Sverdlovsk. yuryd. yn-t. Sverdlovsk, 1983. S. 24–27.

Taran O. V. Kryminalistychne zabezpechennya rozsliduvannya zlochyniv, povʼyazanykh z porushennyam vymoh zakonodavstva pro okhoronu pratsi: avtoref. dys. … dokt. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 / Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav. Kyyiv, 2013. 34 s.