Keywords
кримінальне провадженн
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this article is opening of necessity of application of ECHR practice in the decisions of the investigating judge to increase the value of judicial control over the observance of rights, freedoms and interests of individuals in criminal proceedings. The article includes analysis of the current legislation on the definition of judicial review at the pre-trial investigation stage. Judicial control is revealed through the powers of the investigating judge in criminal proceedings.
There were examined opinions of scientists in relation to determinations of judicial control and function of investigation judge on the stage of pre-trial investigation. It is possible to draw conclusion from the analysis of the last scientific researches, that expansion of scopes of judicial control in a criminal production, it is a next step to rethink the value of judicial control in criminal proceedings. Decisions taken by the investigating judge should be based on the principles of legality and rule of law. The conclusion about the need to study the application of ECHR investigating judges to strengthen the role of the court at the stage of pre-trial investigation and reduction of procedural errors that can become new ECHR judgments against Ukraine. Judicial statistics and decision of consequence judges content are analysed with the use of practice of ECHR for 2018 and beginning 2019 years.
Out of analysis of judicial statistics a conclusion is made that tendency on application of practice of ECHR in 2019 is slowly, but grows. The necessity of wide use of practice of ECHR courts is examined during realization of judicial control in a criminal proceedings. The estimation is given to expansion of the list of proceedings that must be carried out with the permission of the investigating judge. It is analyzed the shortcomings of the application of the ECHR practice courts and disadvantages such as the decision by the investigating judge ruling, not under criminal procedural rules. The practice of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court is analysed. It is given the risks of the work of the investigating judge, who can relate to undue interference in the work of law enforcement. It is noted the decision of the ECHR ‘Volokhi against Ukraine’ dated November 2, 2006. It is concluded that the judicial review of the investigative actions should also include the application of the ECHR practice, and application of ECHR in the activities of the investigating judge at the pre-trial investigation stage is a prerequisite for respect for the rule rights in criminal proceedings and the strategic task for Ukraine.
References
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyikodeksUkrainy vid 13.04.2012 No 4651-VI [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine as of 13.04.2012 No 4651-VI]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy [Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine], 2013, No 9–10, No 11–12, No 13. 88 p. [in Ukrainian].
Makarov, M. A. (2018). Sudovyi control u kryminalnomu protsesi: teoretychni ta pravovi osnovy avtoref. dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 [Judicial control in criminal proceedings: theoretical and legal grounds]. Kyiv, 38 p. [in Ukrainian].
Poliukhovych, O. I. (2017). Sudovyi control pry provedenni nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii: dys. ... kand yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 [Judicial control during the conduct of secret investigative (search) actions] Kharkiv, 219 p. [in Ukrainian].
Prо vykonannia rishen ta zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny: Zakon Ukrainy vіd 23.02.2006 [On implementation of decisions and application of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights Law of Ukraine] Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy[Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine]. 2006. No 30, р. 1114. [in Ukrainian]
Uzahalnennia praktyky zastosuvannia sudamy zahalnoi yurysdyktsii pershoi ta apeliatsiinoi instantsii pry zdiisnenni sudochynstva u kryminalnykh spravakh statei 3, 5, 6 Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod 1950 roku za 2011 – pershe pivrichchia 2012 roku [Generalization of the practice of courts of general jurisdiction of the first and appellate instances in the execution of criminal proceedings in articles 3, 5, 6 of the 1950 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms for 2011 – the first half of 2012]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/n0001740-13 (request date 02.03.2019). [in Ukrainian].
Prо Derzhavnyi biudzhet Ukrainy nа2019 rik: Zakon Ukrainy vіd 23.11.2018. [On the State Budget of Ukraine for 2019: The Law of Ukraine] Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. 2018, No 98, p. 67. [in Ukrainian].
Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [General State Register of Court Decisions]: URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/ (request date 27.02.2019). [in Ukrainian].
Praktyka Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny v diialnosti orhaniv prokuratury i sudu: vyklyky ta perspektyvy: Materialy I Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii vid 13 chervnia 2018 roku. [Practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the work of the prosecutor's office and the court: challenges and perspectives] Kyiv, 2018. 206 p. URL: http://napu.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/praktuka_evropeuskogo_sudu.pdf (request date 27.02.2019). [in Ukrainian].
Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [General State Register of Court Decisions]: Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 23 travnia 2018 roku, sprava No 237/1459/17, provadzhennia No 13-19кс18. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74475877 (request date 28.02.2019). [in Ukrainian].
Nazarov, V. V., Trakalo, R. I. (2014). Sudovyi control u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty: Yevropeiski perspektyvy [Judicial Control in Criminal Proceedings: Theoretical and Practical Aspects: European Perspectives]. No 10. pp. 89–95. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/evpe_2014_10_17 (request date 28.02.2019). [in Ukrainian].