Міжвідомчий Науково-методичний збірник
"Криміналістика і судова експертиза"
ISSN: 2786-7072 (Online); ISSN: 2786-7080 (Print)
PDF Kataraga67 Завантажень: 93, розмiр: 287.4 KB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2022.67.01

O. Kataraga, P. Petkovich, V. Prisekaru

In this article, the authors deal with a topic that does not have a single approach
at the international level. The issue concerns the impossibility conclusion formulated
by the forensic expert in the expert repor t, which is often confused with the refusal.

The authors provide gnoseological evidence regarding the delimitation of these two
forms of answers offered to the judicial process by the expert.

The importance of the issue discussed stems from the very role of forensic ex-
pertise in the administration of justice and to add value in this regard.

Keywords: forensic expertise, methodical study, conclusions of the expert,
impossibility, refusal, explanation, the result of the research.