The model of forensic psychiatric evaluation of ability to realize the significance of their actions and governe them by persons who have commited sexual offenses
Banner en_US
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

forensic psychiatric examination
responsibility – limited responsibility – irresponsibility
sexual offense

How to Cite

Kozeratska, O. (2019). The model of forensic psychiatric evaluation of ability to realize the significance of their actions and governe them by persons who have commited sexual offenses. Criminalistics and Forensics, (64), 844 - 850. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.80

Abstract

The article gives the results of scientific research conducted within the Framework of the doctoral thesis ‘Forensic psychiatric evaluation of persons who Have committed sexual criminal offenses’. For the purposes of the study the Author analyzed 287 cases of forensic psychiatric examinations regarding the Subject, who committed the sexual offense and were at the forensic psychiatric Examination in Kiev city center forensic psychiatric examination in 2000 to 2015 (16 years old). The study revealed the criteria of «limited responsibility» for the Perpetrators of sexual crimes, offered a forensic psychiatric assessment model for Ability to understand their actions and to govern them in individuals who have Committed sexual offenses.

https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.80
PDF (Українська)

References

Zhyzha A.O. (2011). Analiz zlochyniv proty statevoi svobody ta nedotorkannocti osoby. [Analysis of crimes against sexual freedom and inviolability of a person.] Derzhava ta pehiony. Ser. Pravo, Vyp.2 S.98-100

Stetiukha M.P. (2013). Sekcualnye prava cheloveka: novyi vzgliad sovremennogo obshchestva na reguliatsiu seksualnogo povedeniia. [Human sexual rights: a new view of modern society on the regulation of sexual behavior.] Istoriia, filosofiia, politika i iuridicheskie nauki, kultorologiia i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. No 9. рр. 189–192.

Mikhailova O.Iu. (2000).Kriminalnaia seksualnaia agressiia: teoretiko-metodologicheskii podkhod. [Criminal sexual aggression: a theoretical and methodological approach.] Rostov-na-Donu, 146 p.

Pervomaiskii V.B., Ileiko V.R. (1994). Sistemnyi podkhod k poniatiiu ogranichennaia vmeniaemost. [System approach to the concept of limited responsibility] Sudebnaia i sotsialnaia psikhiatriia 90-hk godov: materialy mezhdunar. konf.Kiev, Т. 1. рр. 90–91.

Kondratev F.V. (1996). Metodologiches-kie aspekty problem ogranichenoi vmeniaemosti. [Methodological aspects of the problem of limited responsibility.] Ogranichenaia vmeniaemost: sb. nauch. tr. Moskva, рр. 18–28.

Mezhdunarodnaia klassifikatsiia boleznei [International Classification of Diseases] (10-y peresmotr). Klassifikatsiia psikhicheskikh i povedencheskihk rasstroistv: klinicheskie opicaniia i ukazaniia po diagnostike. [Classification of mental and behavioral disorders: clinical descriptions and instructions for diagnosis.] Kiev, 1999. 270 p.

Spaans M., Barendregt M., Haan B. [et al.]. (2011).Diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder and criminal responsibility. Int. J. Law Psychiatry, Vol. 34, No 5. рр. 374–378.

Porter S., Woodworth M., Earle J. [et al.].(2003). Characteristics of sexual homicides committed by psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. Law Hum. Behav. Vol. 27, No 5. рр. 459–470.

Ciardha C. O., Ward T. (2013). Theories of cognitive distortions in sexual offending: what the current research tells us. Trauma. Violence Abuse. Vol. 14, No 1. р.р 5–21.

Mihailides S., Devilly G. J., Ward T.(2004). Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending Sex. Abuse. 2004. Vol. 16, No 4. рр. 333–350.

Barnett G. D.Mann R. E. (2013). Cognition, empathy, and sexual offending. Trauma. Violence Abuse. 2013. Vol. 14, No 1. рр. 22–33.